“There is not any ocular evidence to show that Muhammad Abbas was murdered by any of the present petitioners. Mere fact that Noor Muhammad and Muhammad Din saw firstly the deceased and after a ways they observed the petitioners going towards the same direction, didn't mean that the petitioners were chasing the deceased or were accompanying him. These types of evidence cannot be treated as evidence of previous noticed.

Some sites could possibly specialize in specific areas of regulation, though others offer a broader database. Factors to consider when choosing a website involve the comprehensiveness of the database, the ease of navigation, along with the availability of advanced search options.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the moment case, the guidelines as set forth would not utilize, given that the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, relatively he has been acquitted on the criminal charges based on evidence and it is very well-settled law that once the civil servant is acquitted within the criminal case, then on this pretty charge he cannot be awarded in almost any punishment from the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan while in the case of your District Police Officer Mainwali and a couple of others v.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

R.O, Office, Gujranwala as well as police officials didn't inform him that the identification parade of your accused has not been conducted nonetheless. In the instant case, now the accused tried to just take advantage of the program aired by SAMAA News, wherein the picture on the petitioner was commonly circulated. The police should not have exposed the identity of your accused through electronic media. The legislation lends assurance on the accused that the identity should not be subjected to the witnesses, particularly for the witness to identify the accused before the Magistrate. The C.P.O, Gujranwala present in court, stated here that the Investigating Officer place a mask over the accused to conceal their identity and produced pics. Aside from, the images shown to the media reveal that a mask was not placed over the accused to hide his identity until finally he was place up for an identification parade. Making images from the accused publically, both by showing the same to the witness or by publicizing the same in any newspaper or software, would create doubt inside the proceedings of your identification parade. The Investigating Officer has to ensure that there isn't any prospect for your witness to begin to see the accused before going to your identification parade. The accused should not be shown for the witness in person or through any other manner, i.e., photograph, video-graph, or even the push or electronic media. Provided the reasons elaborated previously mentioned, the case against the petitioner needs further probe and inquiry within the meanings of Section 497(2), Cr.P.C.

For that foregoing reasons the moment suit is dismissed with no order regarding cost. Office to prepare decree in the above mentioned terms. Read more

                                                                  

This guide delivers beneficial insights into free online resources offering access to Pakistani case law, helping you navigate the complexities of legal research.

The Court directed the Chief Secretary of Sindh to ensure the Act's effective implementation in line with its unique purpose and called for educational programs Bachelor degree(s) in the subject of cooperative societies. Read more

Please note, In case you are seeking a price exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly. 

                                                                  

this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion of the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

In case the employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer has not had a possibility to reply to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to include the grievance notice. However, this is usually only carried out When the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. In the present case, the parties were allowed to lead evidence and the petitioner company responded to your allegations as a result they were very well mindful of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use to be looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator), Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Abdur Rahman Source: Order: Downloads 173 Order Date: 04-FEB-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

competent authority has determined the eligibility of the private respondents and found them being suit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)